Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
Michele Simionato
michele.simionato at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 02:35:47 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 7 02:35:47 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Next message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers > Michele Simionato a écrit : > > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the > > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?) > > Can't tell, but I'd trust the Pylons team on this kind of choices. > They're doing good job so far AFAICT. Probably Beaker works well, but it is certainly NOT doing things as Eby recommends: http://dirtsimple.org/2007/02/wsgi-middleware-considered-harmful.html BTW, I know that Eby is asking opinions about WSGI 2.0 on the WSGI SIG and interested people may have a look there. Michele Simionato
- Previous message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Next message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list