The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
Bent C Dalager
bcd at pvv.ntnu.no
Wed Oct 3 17:09:43 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 3 17:09:43 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
- Next message (by thread): The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <Vq-dnfzSmOiOn5nanZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d at insightbb.com>, rjack <rjack at com> wrote: >Webster? WEBSTER. . . ? > >Whatever happened to the Oxford English Dictionary ? It suffers from not being in my "dict" installation I suppose. >Seems to me the English have always spoken the definitive >English. . . that's why they call it ENGLISH. Unfortunately, these days English almost always means American English and if you want British English you have to specify that explicitly. But I don't actually think that the difference is significant to the current controversy surrounding the interpretation of the word "free". Cheers Bent D -- Bent Dalager - bcd at pvv.org - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd powered by emacs
- Previous message (by thread): The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
- Next message (by thread): The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list