Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]
Michele Simionato
michele.simionato at gmail.com
Sun Oct 14 04:46:58 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 14 04:46:58 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Next message (by thread): Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 14, 2:52 am, Ian Bicking <i... at colorstudy.com> wrote: > That said, going without a framework (which at least in his article is > what Michele seems to be comparing Pylons against) isn't always so > bad. I started writing an Atompub server in Pylons, but felt like I > was spending too much time navigating around what the framework setup > and not enough time just paying attention to what Atompub really is. > So I ended up writing it (as FlatAtomPub), effectively without a > framework (though developing it at the same time as WebOb, so I leaned > on that quite a bit). The development went quite well, and for a web > service like Atompub that's probably what I'd recommend (at least to > experienced developers -- you might find yourself left to drift > otherwise without a clear idea of where to start). > > But for writing a traditional web application, I'd still use Pylons. > The choices Pylons have made are with that in mind, and it doesn't at > all exclude other forms of development in the process. You could > actually drop a FlatAtomPub instance right into a Pylons app, for > instance. Pylons is a small enough framework that it really is quite > reasonable to pick and choose and use a very minimal style with it. I think we do agree entirely, it is just that the application we have in mind is more a collection of web services than a traditional Web application. Now, since you are here, there is an unrelated question that I want to ask you, concerning the future of Paste with respect to WSGI 2.0. I do realize that at this stage WSGI 2.0, is only a draft, still I would like to know: 1. if you think that WSGI 2.0 is good idea (I expect you will say "yes") 2. if you plan to support it in Paste and if yes when (I mean, in a month, in a year, in three years?) 3. if you already have thought of a migration plan and, in that case, what your strategy would likely be. Thanks for sharing, Michele Simionato
- Previous message (by thread): Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
- Next message (by thread): Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list