Python 3K or Python 2.9?
Ben Finney
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Wed Sep 12 00:14:00 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Sep 12 00:14:00 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Python 3K or Python 2.9?
- Next message (by thread): Python 3K or Python 2.9?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> writes: > TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd at aol.com> writes: > > Python user and advocate Bruce Eckel is disappointed with the > > additions (or lack of additions) in Python 3: > > > > http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=214112 > > That article is pretty weak. It is responded to by Guido here: "A Response to Bruce Eckel" <URL:http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=214325> -- \ "The trouble with eating Italian food is that five or six days | `\ later you're hungry again." -- George Miller | _o__) | Ben Finney
- Previous message (by thread): Python 3K or Python 2.9?
- Next message (by thread): Python 3K or Python 2.9?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list