can Python be useful as functional?
Grant Edwards
grante at visi.com
Tue Sep 18 12:51:43 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Sep 18 12:51:43 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): can Python be useful as functional?
- Next message (by thread): can Python be useful as functional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2007-09-18, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > Lorenzo Stella wrote: > [...] >> >> My question is: how can we call a language "functional" if >> it's major implementation has a limited stack? Or is my code >> wrong? > > So, which environment do you habitually use that provides an > *unlimited* stack? Perhaps Lorenzo Stella is referring to Python's lack of tail-recursion optimization? There are languages that guarantee unlimited tail-recursion with a limited stack. That's a typical feature for a function language, right? > You just don't like the specific limit that Python imposes. So > increase it with sys.setrecursionlimit(). -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I hope I bought the at right relish ... zzzzzzzzz visi.com ...
- Previous message (by thread): can Python be useful as functional?
- Next message (by thread): can Python be useful as functional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list