end of print = lower productivity ?
Tim Chase
python.list at tim.thechases.com
Mon Dec 1 10:46:43 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 1 10:46:43 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): end of print = lower productivity ?
- Next message (by thread): end of print = lower productivity ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> For a proof, let's see what Google has to say about this: > "Windows text editor". Vim is on page 3, near the turning > point where nobody is talking about text-editor anymore and > more about text-editor reviews. Even worse is Emacs, on page > 6, after many other popular text-editors have been mentioned > several times. That's a pretty malformed "proof": http://www.google.com/search?q=people%20you%20should%20listen%20to%20regarding%20choice%20of%20text-editor You don't appear anywhere in the top *10* pages...QED ;-) However, if you want to play that game, vim.org appears on page #1 of http://www.google.com/search?q=best+text+editor Use what editor works for you -- but if evolution in the language's features makes difficulties for you but not for users of other editors, it's your editor that's the problem, not the language. Viva-la-print-function'ly yers, -tkc
- Previous message (by thread): end of print = lower productivity ?
- Next message (by thread): end of print = lower productivity ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list