alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe
James Stroud
jstroud at mbi.ucla.edu
Mon Dec 15 03:53:53 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 15 03:53:53 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe
- Next message (by thread): alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ben Finney wrote: > James Stroud <jstroud at mbi.ucla.edu> writes: > >> Ben Finney wrote: >>> James Stroud <jstroud at mbi.ucla.edu> writes: >>> >>>> Yes. I think it was the British who decided that the apostrophe >>>> rule for "it" would be reversed from normal usage relative to >>>> just about every other noun. > > It also seems an indefensible claim to say that anyone “decided” it > would be that way, especially “the British”. > >>> Remember that “it” is a pronoun. I see no reversal: >> Ok. Pronouns are reversed. > > Or, more generally: Pronouns, which are different in just about every > other way from other nouns, are different in this way also. Is that > about right? > Can we start talking about python again? -- James Stroud UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics Box 951570 Los Angeles, CA 90095 http://www.jamesstroud.com
- Previous message (by thread): alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe
- Next message (by thread): alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list