building an extension module with autotools?
Michael George
mdgeorge at cs.cornell.edu
Wed Dec 3 17:04:21 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Dec 3 17:04:21 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): building an extension module with autotools?
- Next message (by thread): building an extension module with autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gerhard Häring wrote: > Michael George wrote: >> I've tried using automake, > > In my opinion, this is serious overkill. automake is good for making > stuff work on a herd of different Unixen with various combinations of > libc functions available etc. But for developing a Python extension, > it doesn't help much at all. All you need to know about Python is > available via macros if you import Python.h. > I'll definitely consider going the simpler route, although the other thing that autotools provides is a standard interface for end-users. For example I'm picky and don't let anything into /usr that isn't under the purview of the package manager. autotools makes life easy because I can just do ./configure --prefix=/opt/pkgname and I know I'm good. Custom build setups force me to figure them out before I can install (and sometimes even use) the program. Since I'll be eventually trying to attract users, I'd like to avoid scaring them away with custom build scripts :) > HTH > > -- Gerhard Thanks for the advice. --Mike
- Previous message (by thread): building an extension module with autotools?
- Next message (by thread): building an extension module with autotools?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list