Why not a Python compiler?
Stefan Behnel
stefan_ml at behnel.de
Thu Feb 7 05:03:12 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 7 05:03:12 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Star Wars and parsecs [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next message (by thread): Why not a Python compiler?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Santiago Romero wrote: > I'm impressed with python. I'm very happy with the language and I > find Python+Pygame a very powerful and productive way of writing 2D > games. I'm not, at this moment, worried about execution speed of the > small game I'm working on (it runs at full 60 fps even in an old AMD- > K6 450 Laptop computer), but I continue asking me the same question: > > Why not a Python COMPILER? > > It would be very nice to be able to output Linux, MAC or Windows > binaries of compiled (not bytecompiled) code. It would run faster, it > will be smaller in size (I think) Take a look at Cython. It's an optimising Python-to-C compiler for writing Python extensions. So you can basically take a Python module and compile it to C code that runs against the CPython runtime. http://cython.org/ > and it will be easy to distribute to > people not having python installed. Yes, I know about py2exe, but I'm > not sure if that's the right aproach. That's a different focus, but then, there's "portable Python". http://www.portablepython.com/ Stefan
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Star Wars and parsecs [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next message (by thread): Why not a Python compiler?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list