How about adding rational fraction to Python?
Ross Ridge
rridge at caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Thu Feb 28 14:41:56 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 28 14:41:56 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): Floating point bug?
- Next message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > Not obvious to you. You are using subjective perception as if it was > a law of nature. If "obvious" was the criteria then I would argue that > the only proper result of integer division is (int, int). Give me the > result and the remainder and let me figure it out. J. Cliff Dyer <jcd at sdf.lonestar.org> wrote: > I'd like to point out that now you are talking about int OP int > returning a tuple, not an int. No, D'Arcy's point was that "obvious" isn't the criteria because it would lead to behaviour that no one wants. No one is going to win this argument by using words like "natural" or "obvious". You're just going to have to accept that there that there is no concensus on this issue and there never was. In the end only one person's opinion of what was natural and obvious really matters. Ross Ridge -- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU [oo][oo] rridge at csclub.uwaterloo.ca -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ db //
- Previous message (by thread): Floating point bug?
- Next message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list