OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
Grant Edwards
grante at visi.com
Mon Feb 11 21:26:27 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 11 21:26:27 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next message (by thread): OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2008-02-12, Jeff Schwab <jeff at schwabcenter.com> wrote: > Erik Max Francis wrote: >> Jeff Schwab wrote: >> >>> So what's the "double mistake?" My understanding was (1) the misuse >>> (ok, vernacular use) of the term "free fall," and (2) the association >>> of weight with free-fall velocity ("If I tie an elephant's tail to a >>> mouse's, and drop them both into free fall, will the mouse slow the >>> elephant down?") >> >> I presume his point was that physicists have a specialized meaning of >> "free fall" and, in that context, the answer is wrong. >> >> My point was, and still is, that if this question without further >> context is posed to a generally educated laymen, the supposedly wrong >> answer that was given is actually _correct_. After all, >> [...] > Fair enough! Dear me, what's Usenet coming to these days... -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! Are we in the at perfect mood? visi.com
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Next message (by thread): OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python compiler?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list