How about adding rational fraction to Python?
Grant Edwards
grante at visi.com
Tue Feb 26 21:11:34 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 26 21:11:34 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Next message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2008-02-27, J. Clifford Dyer <jcd at sdf.lonestar.org> wrote: > But I don't think that *was* the issue in the first place. The > issue is whether python's division should only yield integers > when given integer inputs. "Natural" is a polemical term no > matter who is using it in this argument, so lets drop it > altogether. If the issue is that it should remain an integer > because that mimics how the computer works, than I think it is > worth pointing out that allowing a conversion to a long also > goes against how the computer works; I would have preferred that didn't happen either. I just don't like implicit/automatic conversions from one type to another. "If I wanted a long, I'd have used a long." > the computer would have a register overflow. If the issue is > that in python the division operator has always performed > integer division, and should not change, then I think we're > talking about a philosophical opposition to Python 3 that goes > far deeper than just how integer division behaves. > > At any rate, the whole argument is irrelevant Certainly. The decision has been made and it's not going to change -- at least not until the next time it changes. :) -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is this ANYWHERE, at USA? visi.com
- Previous message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Next message (by thread): How about adding rational fraction to Python?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list