Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Fri Feb 1 01:26:19 EST 2008
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 1 01:26:19 EST 2008
- Previous message (by thread): Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry
- Next message (by thread): Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Paddy" <paddy3118 at googlemail.com> wrote in message news:9f54ffca-fcb7-47b4-abba-d8e3e96b863c at v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... | On Feb 1, 12:18 am, "Terry Reedy" <tjre... at udel.edu> wrote: | > ANSI does not actually make standards. It make metastandards about how to | > make standards (both style and process) and accredites US standard-making | > bodies that will follow those metastandards. The processes require | > committee meetings and public comment periods -- a few years and some $$$. | > There in no guarantee that what would come out of such a process would be | > what went in, so 'Standard Python' might easily be a language with no | > implementations. | > | > ANSI standards are owned by ANSI or perhaps the accrediting body. In any | > case, electronic copies sell for $30. They cannot legally be accessed free | > as for the docs at python.org. | | HI Terry, | Is their a standardizing body out their to `legitimise` open source | languages like Python? Not that I know of. There are at least a couple hundred ANSI-accredited bodies. The application fee to become one is $3000. But some group could act independently, perhaps with streamlined procedures, including meeting by email or chat to cut out the large expenses of meetings, for instance. tjr
- Previous message (by thread): Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry
- Next message (by thread): Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list