Interesting talk on Python vs. Ruby and how he would like Python to have just a bit more syntactic flexibility.
cjw
cjw at ncf.ca
Wed Feb 17 13:51:50 EST 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 17 13:51:50 EST 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Interesting talk on Python vs. Ruby and how he would like Python to have just a bit more syntactic flexibility.
- Next message (by thread): Interesting talk on Python vs. Ruby and how he would like Python to have just a bit more syntactic flexibility.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 17-Feb-10 05:48 AM, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >> In message <60b1abce-4381-46ab-91ed- >> f2ab2154c0a1 at g19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> >>> Also, lambda's are expressions, not statements ... >> >> Is such a distinction Pythonic, or not? > > Python is (by design) a statement-based language, so yes, this > distinction is pythonic !-) Aren't lambda forms better described as function? Colin W.
- Previous message (by thread): Interesting talk on Python vs. Ruby and how he would like Python to have just a bit more syntactic flexibility.
- Next message (by thread): Interesting talk on Python vs. Ruby and how he would like Python to have just a bit more syntactic flexibility.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list