ctypes' c_longdouble: underflow error (bug?)
Thomas Jollans
thomas at jollans.com
Thu Jul 15 13:04:19 EDT 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 15 13:04:19 EDT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): ctypes' c_longdouble: underflow error (bug?)
- Next message (by thread): ctypes' c_longdouble: underflow error (bug?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/15/2010 06:41 PM, kj wrote: > In <mailman.733.1279124991.1673.python-list at python.org> Thomas Jollans <thomas at jollans.com> writes: > >> http://docs.python.org/library/ctypes.html#fundamental-data-types > >> c_longdouble maps to float > > Thanks for pointing this out! > ~K > (Does it make *any difference at all* to use c_longdouble instead > of c_double? If not, I wonder what's the point of having c_longdouble > at all.) they're still different types (in C). on my machine, a double is 64 bits wide, while a long double is 128 bits wide. This means that a function that expects a long double argument will expect 16 bytes, but ctypes will only pass 8 bytes if you tell it to pass double. The same applies to return values.
- Previous message (by thread): ctypes' c_longdouble: underflow error (bug?)
- Next message (by thread): ctypes' c_longdouble: underflow error (bug?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list