Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
Robert Kern
robert.kern at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 23:18:03 EDT 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jun 25 23:18:03 EDT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Next message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2010-06-25 19:47 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message<mailman.2046.1277445301.32709.python-list at python.org>, Cameron > Simpson wrote: > >> On 25Jun2010 15:38, Lawrence D'Oliveiro<ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand> >> wrote: >> >> | In message<2010062422432660794-angrybaldguy at gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson >> | wrote: >> >> |> Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM >> |> features, can do it for me? >> | >> | SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very flexible. Looking at the code examples >> |<http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/examples.html>, they’re very procedural: >> | build object, then do a string of separate method calls to add data to >> | it. I prefer the functional approach, as in my table-update example. >> >> He said "without using its ORM". > > I noticed that. So were those examples I referenced above “using its ORM”? > Can you offer better examples “without using its ORM”? http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/sqlexpression.html -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
- Previous message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Next message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list