Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
Gregory Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Mon Jun 28 05:44:53 EDT 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jun 28 05:44:53 EDT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Next message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carl Banks wrote: > Indeed, strncpy does not copy that final NUL if it's at or beyond the > nth element. Probably the most mind-bogglingly stupid thing about the > standard C library, which has lots of mind-boggling stupidity. I don't think it was as stupid as that back when C was designed. Every byte of memory was precious in those days, and if you had, say, 10 bytes allocated for a string, you wanted to be able to use all 10 of them for useful data. So the convention was that a NUL byte was used to mark the end of the string *if it didn't fill all the available space*. Functions such as strncpy and snprintf are designed for use with strings that follow this convention. Proper usage requires being cognizant of the maximum length and using appropriate length-limited functions for all operations on such strings. -- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Next message (by thread): Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list