A "scopeguard" for Python
Alf P. Steinbach
alfps at start.no
Fri Mar 5 08:09:08 EST 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Mar 5 08:09:08 EST 2010
- Previous message (by thread): A "scopeguard" for Python
- Next message (by thread): A "scopeguard" for Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
* Robert Kern: > On 2010-03-04 16:27 , Alf P. Steinbach wrote: >> * Mike Kent: > >>> However, I fail to understand his response that I must have meant try/ >>> else instead, as this, as Mr. Kern pointed out, is invalid syntax. >>> Perhaps Mr. Steinbach would like to give an example? >> >> OK. >> >> Assuming that you wanted the chdir to be within a try block (which it >> was in your code), then to get code equivalent to my code, for the >> purpose of a comparision of codes that do the same, you'd have to write >> something like ... >> >> original_dir = os.getcwd() >> try: >> os.chdir(somewhere) >> except Whatever: >> # E.g. log it. >> raise >> else: >> try: >> # Do other stuff >> finally: >> os.chdir(original_dir) >> # Do other cleanup >> >> ... which would be a more general case. >> >> I've also given this example in response to Robert earlier in the >> thread. Although I haven't tried it I believe it's syntactically valid. >> If not, then the relevant typo should just be fixed. :-) >> >> I have no idea which construct Robert thought was syntactically invalid. >> I think that if he's written that, then it must have been something he >> thought of. > > I was just trying to interpret what you meant by "Changing 'finally' to > 'else' could make it equivalent." Oh yes, in the article where I gave the example of that, shown above. Hey, discussing previous discussion is silly. Cheers, - ALf
- Previous message (by thread): A "scopeguard" for Python
- Next message (by thread): A "scopeguard" for Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list