"Strong typing vs. strong testing"
RG
rNOSPAMon at flownet.com
Wed Oct 13 03:27:25 EDT 2010
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 13 03:27:25 EDT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
- Next message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <8hl3grFh2sU1 at mid.individual.net>, Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > RG wrote: > > Even an interest > > rate of 0.1 radians makes sense if for some unfathomable reason you want > > to visualize your interest payment as the relative length of a line > > segment and an arc. > > It could even be quite reasonable if you're presenting it > as a segment of a pie graph. Good point. > For what it's worth, the GST rate here recently increased > from 0.7853 to 0.9425 radians. :-) :-) rg
- Previous message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
- Next message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list