Tim Bradshaw tfb at tfeb.org
Wed Oct 13 08:45:02 EDT 2010

• Previous message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
• Next message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 2010-10-13 13:21:29 +0100, BartC said:

> My money would have been on 0.25, based on using 1.0 for a 360° 
> circular angle. It seems far more attractive than using the 
> arbitrary-looking 6.28...

It may look arbitrary, but it isn't: it's about as non-arbitrary as it 
is possible to be.

---

• Previous message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
• Next message (by thread): "Strong typing vs. strong testing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list