Misleading error message of the day
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Thu Dec 8 20:19:50 EST 2011
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 8 20:19:50 EST 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Misleading error message of the day
- Next message (by thread): Misleading error message of the day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <jbqui9$33c$1 at reader1.panix.com>, Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 2011-12-08, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, December 8, 2011 10:03:38 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Pichavant > > wrote: > >> string are iterable, considering this, the error is correct. > > > > Yes, I understand that the exception is correct. I'm not saying the > > exception should be changed, just that we have the opportunity to produce a > > more useful error message. The exception would be equally correct if it > > was: > > > > ValueError: you did something wrong > > My favorite is still the old classic error from and old Unix printer > port driver: > > "lp0 on fire" Well, if you're going to go there, ed had (and probably still does) have but a single all-purpose error message: "?". The old v6 unix chess program was somewhat more verbose. It said, "eh?" (unless I'm mixing that up with something else).
- Previous message (by thread): Misleading error message of the day
- Next message (by thread): Misleading error message of the day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list