Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Jan 16 18:14:44 EST 2011
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jan 16 18:14:44 EST 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
- Next message (by thread): Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/16/2011 1:27 PM, rantingrick wrote: > least look at the awesome screen shots here... > > http://www.wxpython.org/screenshots.php I did. Well, they say, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!". To me, these are mostly awesomely ugly, ugly, ugly. Shot 1: Ugly gray field followed by shot2: ugly black on gray. These first two examples look like Windows 95/8 -- ie, 20th century look, not 21st. Based on this page, wxwidgets would be a regression from tk. Current tkinter on Windows looks like it use native Windows windows. IDLE on WinXP looks like a WinXP app; on Windows 7 it looks like a Windows 7 app. If wxwidgets/wxpython does the same, this page hides it very well. And this is apparently an update from 'the old Screen shots' page. The above is based on presented looks. I have no idea whether, to what extent, and how easily one could duplicate the layout and performance of the examples with tk. There are, however, other problems with wx that I have and will point out in other posts. -- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message (by thread): Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
- Next message (by thread): Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list