__pycache__, one more good reason to stck with Python 2?
Ben Finney
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Mon Jan 17 22:57:13 EST 2011
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 17 22:57:13 EST 2011
- Previous message (by thread): __pycache__, one more good reason to stck with Python 2?
- Next message (by thread): __pycache__, one more good reason to stck with Python 2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> writes: > On 1/17/2011 8:59 PM, Flávio Lisbôa wrote: > > But that's me, i'm sure most of python users don't mind at all. > > Seems so. Complaints are rare. That conclusion isn't valid; the behaviour is (AIUI) only in Python 3.2 and later. You can't presume that a lack of complaints means anything about “most Python users” until those users are on a Python that shows this behaviour. -- \ “If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all | `\ others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking | _o__) power called an idea” —Thomas Jefferson | Ben Finney
- Previous message (by thread): __pycache__, one more good reason to stck with Python 2?
- Next message (by thread): __pycache__, one more good reason to stck with Python 2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list