Octavian Rasnita orasnita at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 02:28:15 EST 2011

• Previous message (by thread): WxPython versus Tkinter.
• Next message (by thread): WxPython versus Tkinter.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

From: "Brendan Simon (eTRIX)" <brendan.simon at etrix.com.au>
> Since it seems the python motto is "Batteries included", then it would 
> seem to me that wxPython is the natural fit as it also has "Batteries 
> included" (e.g. accessibility, native look-n-feel, mature and evolving, 
> can produce simple or complex gui programs, etc, etc).



Yes Brendan, you are perfectly right, but unfortunately WxPython developers 
don't want to have it included in the stdlib.
Finally I understood that this is the main problem, because if they would 
want to do it in the conditions imposed by Python, it would have been much 
easier and many of other problems could have been solved.

But WxPython is their work and they decision is their.

Octavian

---

• Previous message (by thread): WxPython versus Tkinter.
• Next message (by thread): WxPython versus Tkinter.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list