Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
tinnews at isbd.co.uk
tinnews at isbd.co.uk
Mon Jul 18 05:49:00 EDT 2011
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jul 18 05:49:00 EDT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next message (by thread): Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote: > In article <mailman.1190.1310940173.1164.python-list at python.org>, > Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > the line width mandate [...] exists so that people using 80-column editors can open up > > code without having line-wrapping problems. > > Heh. I don't know how many other people on this group grew up with the > original(*) 80-column editor (http://tinyurl.com/3sj4mzb), but I did. > Unlike, well, any editor anybody is likely to use today, it was really, > really hard to make the window wider if you had to. > > We don't have that problem any more. It truly boggles my mind that > we're still churning out people with 80 column minds. I'm willing to > entertain arguments about readability of long lines, but the idea that > there's something magic about 80 columns is hogwash. > The reason for an 80 column limit is not fundamentally down to screen width (as was) it's that our eyes find it much easier to follow lines with a limited length and 80 columns is somewhere around the right line length to keep things easily readable. -- Chris Green
- Previous message (by thread): Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Next message (by thread): Tabs -vs- Spaces: Tabs should have won.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list