gervaz gervaz at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 05:05:47 EDT 2011

• Previous message (by thread): Python scoping
• Next message (by thread): Python scoping
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 21 Giu, 06:06, Ben Finney <ben+pyt... at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Chris Angelico <ros... at gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt... at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > > The *binding* is scoped.
>
> > And the binding follows the exact same rules as anything else would.
> > It has scope and visibility. In terms of the OP, the binding IS like a
> > variable.
>
> Yes. So let's stop behaving as though the *name* behaves like a
> variable. It isn't, and doesn't.
>
> --
>  \          “Computer perspective on Moore's Law: Human effort becomes |
>   `\           twice as expensive roughly every two years.” —anonymous |
> _o__)                                                                  |
> Ben Finney

Ok, thanks for the clarification, I'll take extra care e.g. when
dealing with exceptions.

Ciao,

Mattia

---

• Previous message (by thread): Python scoping
• Next message (by thread): Python scoping
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list