Usefulness of the "not in" operator
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 21:29:45 EDT 2011
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Oct 8 21:29:45 EDT 2011
- Previous message (by thread): Usefulness of the "not in" operator
- Next message (by thread): Usefulness of the "not in" operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I sent this email twelve hours ago but to the wrong mailing list *blush*. Since nobody else has raised the point, I'll repost it. On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula at ling.helsinki.fi> wrote: > But both negations can be avoided by modus tollens. > > "If you are able to start the car, the key is in the ignition." > But this translation implies looking at the result and ascertaining the state, which is less appropriate to a programming language. It's more like: "If you found that you were able to start the car, the key must have been in the ignition." and is thus quite inappropriate to the imperative style. A functional language MAY be able to use this style, but Python wants to have the condition and then the action. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): Usefulness of the "not in" operator
- Next message (by thread): Usefulness of the "not in" operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list