Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Sat Oct 15 00:24:40 EDT 2011

• Previous message (by thread): Language Enhancement Idea to help with multi-processing (your opinions please)
• Next message (by thread): Language Enhancement Idea to help with multi-processing (your opinions please)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2 at rebertia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:23 PM, alex23 <wuwei23 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well sure, but imaginary syntax can do _anything_. That doesn't mean
>> it's possible within CPython.
>
> But it's The Future now! Where are my jetpack and `dwim` statement,
> dammit?!  :-)

If you can imagine something your language can't do, you're not using
enough preprocessors.

ChrisA
who, frustrated by Java about ten years ago, started running his .java
files through the C preprocessor... and it can get a lot worse than
that

---

• Previous message (by thread): Language Enhancement Idea to help with multi-processing (your opinions please)
• Next message (by thread): Language Enhancement Idea to help with multi-processing (your opinions please)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list