python 6 compilation failure on RHEL
Emile van Sebille
emile at fenx.com
Mon Aug 20 17:50:55 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Aug 20 17:50:55 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): python 6 compilation failure on RHEL
- Next message (by thread): python 6 compilation failure on RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/20/2012 1:55 PM Walter Hurry said... > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:19:23 -0700, Emile van Sebille wrote: > >> Package dependencies. If the OP intends to install a package that >> doesn't support other than 2.6, you install 2.6. > > It would be a pretty poor third party package which specified Python 2.6 > exactly, rather than (say) "Python 2.6 or later, but not Python 3" It doesn't need to be a poorly supported third party package to require a non-current version of python -- just something as simple as an up and running application. Suppose you're migrating an application to new hardware. To make it interesting, assume it's a 10 year old zope application. It's likely that to minimize effort you'll gather (assuming you didn't save your sources - you do install from source, right?) and install the versions prescribed. Of course, if you're comfortable upgrading to the latest release then then, by all means, do so. For me, python is used for for dozens of rather significant one-offs that I prefer not to upgrade. Why mess with a working app. Emile
- Previous message (by thread): python 6 compilation failure on RHEL
- Next message (by thread): python 6 compilation failure on RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list