os.system and subprocess odd behavior
Cameron Simpson
cs at zip.com.au
Tue Dec 18 18:03:16 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Dec 18 18:03:16 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): os.system and subprocess odd behavior
- Next message (by thread): os.system and subprocess odd behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18Dec2012 05:39, Dave Angel <d at davea.name> wrote: | On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Hans Mulder wrote: | > On 18/12/12 06:10:43, photonymous at gmail.com wrote: | >> I hope I understand the question... but shouldn't you wait for the process to complete before exiting? | >> | >> Something like: | >> | >> pid = subprocess.Popen(...) | >> pid.wait() | >> | >> Otherwise, it'll exit before the background process is done. | > Why would that be a problem? | | Because you don't want to bog the system down with a zombie task. A zombie task is just a process table slot; it costs the system almost nothing. It is untidy but except in extreme cases, not a performance or resource issue. OTOH, a child process that is still active (pointlessly) might be a problem... -- Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> My initial work-around is to rebuild history. - gary at sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston)
- Previous message (by thread): os.system and subprocess odd behavior
- Next message (by thread): os.system and subprocess odd behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list