Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
Arnaud Delobelle
arnodel at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 09:36:52 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 9 09:36:52 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
- Next message (by thread): Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9 February 2012 14:00, Laurent Claessens <moky.math at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is my question: I would like to start an in-house library of small >> modules to import, for things like error handling/logging. That's easy >> enough, but is there a recommended way of naming such modules? I am >> concerned about avoiding name clashes with standard modules and site >> packages. >> >> Thanks. >> > > This is not 100% an answer to the question, but you should read that : > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ The OP mentions PEP 8 in the bit of his message that you *don't* quote. -- Arnaud
- Previous message (by thread): Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
- Next message (by thread): Naming convention for in-house modules (Newbie question)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list