.format vs. %
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Tue Jan 3 08:26:57 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jan 3 08:26:57 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Next message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ian Kelly wrote: > I'm not sure it's true that "there are no plans to do so in the > foreseeable future." According to the release notes from Python 3.0, > % formatting was supposed to be deprecated in Python 3.1. Eric Smith wrote (from a thread on pydev in 02-2011): > The last thread on this I have a reference to was in September 2009. I > think was basically the outcome: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-September/092399.html > > So there will be no deprecation, just a gradual shift to PEP 3101 > formatting. Ian Kelly wrote: > Maybe there was a discussion on py-dev > where it was decided that % formatting would not be deprecated after > all (in which case the misleading "obsolete" note really ought to be > removed from the documentation). Agreed that this is a documentation bug. Ian Kelly wrote: > The reason for deprecating it is because Python currently has no fewer > than three mechanisms for string formatting (not even including > ordinary string concatenation), which according to the Zen of Python > is two too many. "one obvious way" != "only one way" ~Ethan~
- Previous message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Next message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list