.format vs. %
Neil Cerutti
neilc at norwich.edu
Tue Jan 3 10:24:19 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jan 3 10:24:19 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Next message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2012-01-03, Neil Cerutti <neilc at norwich.edu> wrote: > On 2012-01-03, Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet at bytereef.org> wrote: >> Neil Cerutti <neilc at norwich.edu> wrote: >>> > In the real-world telco benchmark for _decimal, replacing the >>> > single line >>> > >>> > outfil.write("%s\n" % t) >>> > >>> > with >>> > >>> > outfil.write("{}\n".format(t)) >>> > >>> > adds 23% to the runtime. I think %-style formatting should not >>> > be deprecated at all. >>> >>> When it becomes necessary, it's possible to optimize it by >>> hoisting out the name lookups. >>> ... >>> outfil_write = outfil.write >>> append_newline = "{}\n".format >>> ... >>> outfil_write(append_newline(t)) >>> ... >> >> Did you profile this? I did, and it still adds 22% to the runtime. > > No, I did not. And that's disappointing. On many levels. Thanks for the correction. -- Neil Cerutti
- Previous message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Next message (by thread): .format vs. %
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list