replacing __dict__ with an OrderedDict
Lie Ryan
lie.1296 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 10:57:09 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jan 10 10:57:09 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): replacing __dict__ with an OrderedDict
- Next message (by thread): replacing __dict__ with an OrderedDict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/11/2012 01:05 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article<mailman.4588.1326198152.27778.python-list at python.org>, > Lie Ryan<lie.1296 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 01/10/2012 12:05 PM, Roy Smith wrote: >>> Somewhat more seriously, let's say you wanted to do test queries against >>> a database with 100 million records in it. You could rebuild the >>> database from scratch for each test, but doing so might take hours per >>> test. Sometimes, real life is just*so* inconvenient. >> >> All serious database has rollback feature when they're available to >> quickly revert database state in the setUp/cleanUp phase. > > I guess MongoDB is not a serious database? I guess there are always those oddball cases, but if you choose MongoDB then you already know the consequences that it couldn't be as easily unit-tested. And in any case, it is generally a bad idea to unittest with a database that contains 100 million items, that's for performance testing. So your point is?
- Previous message (by thread): replacing __dict__ with an OrderedDict
- Next message (by thread): replacing __dict__ with an OrderedDict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list