NaN, Null, and Sorting
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Mon Jan 16 05:57:59 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 16 05:57:59 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): NaN, Null, and Sorting
- Next message (by thread): NaN, Null, and Sorting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Eelco <hoogendoorn.eelco at gmail.com> wrote: > What you want, conceptually, is a > sorted list of the sortable entries, and a seperate list of the > unsorted entries. Translated into code, the most pure solution would > be to filter out the nanas/nulls in their own list first, and then > sort the rest. If the interface demands it, you can concatenate the > lists afterwards, but probably it is most convenient to keep them in > seperate lists. So... you split it into two lists, sort the two lists (one of which can't be sorted), and then concatenate them. Sounds like the quicksort algorithm. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): NaN, Null, and Sorting
- Next message (by thread): NaN, Null, and Sorting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list