Is a with on open always necessary?
Lie Ryan
lie.1296 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 21 06:38:44 EST 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jan 21 06:38:44 EST 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Is a with on open always necessary?
- Next message (by thread): Is a with on open always necessary?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/21/2012 02:44 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote: > I normally didn't bother too much when reading from files, and for example > I always did a > > content = open(filename).readlines() > > But now I have the doubt that it's not a good idea, does the file > handler stays > open until the interpreter quits? It is not necessary most of the time, and most likely is not necessary for short-lived programs. The file handler stays open until the file object is garbage collected, in CPython which uses reference counting the file handler is closed when the last reference to the file object is deleted or goes out of context; in python implementations that uses garbage collection method, this is indeterministic. It is only strictly necessary for programs that opens thousands of files in a short while, since the operating system may limit of the number of active file handlers you can have. However, it is considered best practice to close file handlers; making it a habit will avoid problems when you least expect it.
- Previous message (by thread): Is a with on open always necessary?
- Next message (by thread): Is a with on open always necessary?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list