Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Sun Jul 15 04:47:05 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jul 15 04:47:05 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
- Next message (by thread): Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825 at gmail.com> wrote: > Converting 0 and 1 to False and True seems reasonable, but I don't see > the point in converting other arbitrary values. It's for convenience. Unfortunately, not all languages treat all types the same way. It's very handy, though, to be able to use if not foo: foo = some_initializer when foo starts out as, say, None. Or []. Or, in fact, any other "empty" value. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
- Next message (by thread): Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list