Fwd: Launching A Truly Disjoint Process
Ami Tavory
atavory at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 04:41:09 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Mar 12 04:41:09 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Launching A Truly Disjoint Process
- Next message (by thread): What's the best way to parse this HTML tag?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM Subject: Re: Launching A Truly Disjoint Process To: Dave Angel <d at davea.name> Cc: Ami Tavory <atavory at gmail.com>, python-list at python.org On 11Mar2012 17:34, Dave Angel <d at davea.name> wrote: | On 03/11/2012 05:01 PM, Ami Tavory wrote: | > I'm encountering a problem using the multiprocessing module to create a | > process that is truly disjoint from the parent process:... | Why not try using bash as an intermediate executable? Have your first | python process invoke bash, giving it the arguments to in turn launch | the second python process. Why use bash at all? That requires painful and inefficient argument quoting, etc. Just invoke Python itself directly i.e. get subprocess to fork/exec (aka spawn) a new invocation of Python instead of using execfile. Dave, Cameron, Many thanks. I ran some initial tests regarding your suggestions, and things look good. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20120312/fb13f8e1/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Launching A Truly Disjoint Process
- Next message (by thread): What's the best way to parse this HTML tag?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list