len() on mutables vs. immutables
Demian Brecht
demianbrecht at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 14:42:48 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 18 14:42:48 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): len() on mutables vs. immutables
- Next message (by thread): len() on mutables vs. immutables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/18/2012 11:29 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:> Or the length could be the difference of two pointers -- address of the > first empty slot minus address of first item. That would assume contiguous blocks of memory, which I would find to be rather dangerous (of an assumption that is) in most dynamic cases (obviously totally depends on implementation details). > str, bytes, bytearrays, arrays, sets, frozensets, dicts, dictviews, and > ranges should all return len in O(1) time. That includes the possibility > of a subtraction as indicated above. Awesome. Pretty much what I figured. Of course, I'll have to dig around the source just to confirm this with my own eyes (more just curiosity than anything), so if you know whereabouts to look, it would be most helpful :)
- Previous message (by thread): len() on mutables vs. immutables
- Next message (by thread): len() on mutables vs. immutables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list