A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
Grant Edwards
invalid at invalid.invalid
Sat Oct 20 10:18:47 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Oct 20 10:18:47 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
- Next message (by thread): A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2012-10-20, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed at ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Strangely, we've gone from 80-character fixed width displays to > who-knows-what (if I drop my font size I can probably get nearly 200 > characters across in full-screen mode)... > > But at the same time we've gone from 132-character line-printers > using fan-fold 11x17 pages, to office inkjet/laser printers using 8.5x11 > paper, defaulting to portrait orientation -- with a 10 character/inch > font, and 1/4" left/right margins, we're back to 80 character limitation ><G> True, but nobody prints source code out on paper do they? Seriously -- I can't remember the last time I printed souce code... -- Grant
- Previous message (by thread): A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
- Next message (by thread): A desperate lunge for on-topic-ness
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list