Looking for an IPC solution
Laszlo Nagy
gandalf at shopzeus.com
Thu Sep 6 06:13:25 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Sep 6 06:13:25 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Looking for an IPC solution
- Next message (by thread): Looking for an IPC solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Probably the fastest I/RPC implementation for Python should be > OmniOrbpy: > > http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ > > It's cross-platform, language-independent and standard-(Corba-) > compliant. I don't want to use IDL though. Clients will be written in Python, and it would be a waste of time to write IDL files. > >> I have seen a stand alone cross platform IPC server before that could >> serve "channels", and send/receive messages using these channels. But >> I don't remember its name and now I cannot find it. Can somebody >> please help? > If it's just for "messaging", Spread should be interesting: > > http://www.spread.org/ > > Also cross-platform & language-independent. Looks promising. This is what I have found about it: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35490/spread-vs-mpi-vs-zeromq > So, it really depends on whether you are trying to build a parallel > system or distributed system. They are related to each other, but the > implied connotations/goals are different. Parallel programming deals > with increasing computational power by using multiple computers > simultaneously. Distributed programming deals with reliable > (consistent, fault-tolerant and highly available) group of computers. I don't know the full theory behind distributed programming or parallel programming. ZMQ seems easier to use.
- Previous message (by thread): Looking for an IPC solution
- Next message (by thread): Looking for an IPC solution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list