Bitshifts and "And" vs Floor-division and Modular
rusi
rustompmody at gmail.com
Fri Sep 7 12:59:17 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Sep 7 12:59:17 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Bitshifts and "And" vs Floor-division and Modular
- Next message (by thread): Bitshifts and "And" vs Floor-division and Modular
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 7, 9:32 am, Paul Rubin <no.em... at nospam.invalid> wrote: > rusi <rustompm... at gmail.com> writes: > > On an 8086/8088 a MUL (multiply) instruction was of the order of 100 > > clocks ... On most modern processors (after the pentium) the > > difference has mostly vanished. I cant find a good data sheet to > > quote though > > See http://www.agner.org/optimize/: Hey Thanks! Seems like a nice resource! How on earth does he come up with the data though, when Intel does not publish it?
- Previous message (by thread): Bitshifts and "And" vs Floor-division and Modular
- Next message (by thread): Bitshifts and "And" vs Floor-division and Modular
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list