Single leading dash in member variable names?
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Sep 11 17:34:03 EDT 2012
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Sep 11 17:34:03 EDT 2012
- Previous message (by thread): Single leading dash in member variable names?
- Next message (by thread): Single leading dash in member variable names?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/11/2012 4:53 PM, e.doxtator at gmail.com wrote: >>> What is the significance of the leading underscore in "self._bongo"? I've seen this a few times and, after looking through PEP 8, I didn't see anything relevant, but I could have missed it. >> Single leading underscore is a convention indicating that the name >> should be considered private and not used externally. It's a softer >> version of the double leading underscore that means basically the same >> thing but has syntactic significance. > PEP 8 says this is bad form. What do you think? Please quote the specific statement you want commented. The stdlib routinely uses _names for internal implementation objects. __ugh is perhaps never used. -- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message (by thread): Single leading dash in member variable names?
- Next message (by thread): Single leading dash in member variable names?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list