subhabangalore at gmail.com subhabangalore at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 15:17:20 EDT 2012

• Previous message (by thread): HMM based Chunker NLTK
• Next message (by thread): User defined lexical scoping... can I do this?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:40:00 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 18/09/2012 19:35, subhabangalore at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Dear Group,
> 
> > If anyone of the learned members can kindly help with a HMM/CRF based chunker on NLTK.
> 
> >
> 
> > Regards,
> 
> > Subhabrata.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Certainly but how do you intend paying us? :)
> 
> 
> 
> An alternative approach is to provide us with an idea of what you've 
> 
> researched, what code you've written and what problems you've got with 
> 
> it.  If you get a code exception please provide the complete traceback 
> 
> and a mimimal code snippet that reproduces the issue.  This way you're 
> 
> much more likely to get help.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Lawrence.

Two possibilities Mark, either nltk.chunk.(something) or nltk.tag.hmm etc. I am thinking to experiment Regular Expressions, Unigram/Bigram based chunkers are running good even with Indian languages. HMM tag is also going great. I am thinking on the issue.
Regards,
Subhabrata.  

---

• Previous message (by thread): HMM based Chunker NLTK
• Next message (by thread): User defined lexical scoping... can I do this?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list