Python for philosophers
Mark Janssen
dreamingforward at gmail.com
Sat May 11 16:10:45 EDT 2013
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat May 11 16:10:45 EDT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): Python for philosophers
- Next message (by thread): Python for philosophers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Citizen Kant <citizenkant at gmail.com> wrote: >[...] the starting question I make to myself about Python is: which is the single > and most basic use of Python as the entity it is? I mean, beside > programming, what's the single and most basic result one can expect from > "interacting" with it directly (interactive mode)? I roughly came to the > idea that Python could be considered as an economic mirror for data, one > that mainly mirrors the data the programmer types on its black surface, not > exactly as the programmer originally typed it, but expressed in the most > economic way possible. That's to say, for example, if one types >>>1+1 > Python reflects >>>2. When data appears between apostrophes, then the mirror > reflects, again, the same but expressed in the most economic way possible > (that's to say without the apostrophes). Wow. You must be from another planet. Find Socrates if you wish to know these things. He's from there also. A-dam.
- Previous message (by thread): Python for philosophers
- Next message (by thread): Python for philosophers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list