Slicing with negative strides
Mark Lawrence
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 29 05:34:56 EDT 2013
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 29 05:34:56 EDT 2013
- Previous message (by thread): Slicing with negative strides
- Next message (by thread): Slicing with negative strides
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 29/10/2013 08:53, Duncan Booth wrote: > Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > >> Does anyone here use slices (or range/xrange) with negative strides >> other than -1? >> >> E.g. sequence[2:15:-3] > > With any negative stride your example is just the empty sequence. > >> >> >> If so, there is a discussion (long, long, looooooong discussion) on >> the python-ideas mailing list, debating whether or not to deprecate or >> change the behaviour of slicing with negative strides. So if you care >> about the current behaviour, now is the time to stand up and be >> counted. >> >> (Standing up *here* is fine, don't feel that you have to join yet >> another list.) >> > For those of us that don't really want to join another mailing list, could > you summarise what change is being proposed? > Umpteen options have been put forward. IMHO the bookies favourite is currently being endorsed by Tim Peters and Terry Reedy, yours odds may vary :) -- Python is the second best programming language in the world. But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): Slicing with negative strides
- Next message (by thread): Slicing with negative strides
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list