threading
Marko Rauhamaa
marko at pacujo.net
Tue Apr 8 13:17:22 EDT 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Apr 8 13:17:22 EDT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): threading
- Next message (by thread): threading
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sturla Molden <sturla.molden at gmail.com>: > No, 10,000 processes will not do. I never suggested that. In fact, I'm on the record recommending about two processes per CPU core. There are many principles on which to allocate threads/processes: objects, tasks, stimulus sources, CPUs. I'm advocating CPUs. If you use nonblocking primitives, a single process is enough to keep a CPU busy and the throughput high. With multiple processors, you need more processes, but generally not more than one. You should give the hardware a chance to optimize the dataflows a bit so having some extra processes is probably a good idea. Marko
- Previous message (by thread): threading
- Next message (by thread): threading
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list