singleton ... again
Ben Finney
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Feb 12 05:09:25 EST 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 12 05:09:25 EST 2014
- Previous message (by thread): singleton ... again
- Next message (by thread): singleton ... again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> writes: > Roy Smith wrote: > > It looks to me like he's trying to implement a classic Gang of Four > > singleton pattern. > > Which I've never really seen the point of in Python, or any other > language for that matter. Just create one instance of the class during > initialisation, put it in a global somewhere, and use it thereafter. Make that “somewhere” a module namespace, and you effectively have a Singleton for all practical purposes. So yes, I see the point of it; but we already have it built in :-) -- \ “To save the world requires faith and courage: faith in reason, | `\ and courage to proclaim what reason shows to be true.” | _o__) —Bertrand Russell | Ben Finney
- Previous message (by thread): singleton ... again
- Next message (by thread): singleton ... again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list