A curious bit of code...
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Fri Feb 14 09:06:48 EST 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 14 09:06:48 EST 2014
- Previous message (by thread): A curious bit of code...
- Next message (by thread): A curious bit of code...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <mailman.6914.1392380171.18130.python-list at python.org>, Dave Angel <davea at davea.name> wrote: > Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> Wrote in message: > > On 2/13/2014 1:37 PM, forman.simon at gmail.com wrote: > >> I ran across this and I thought there must be a better way of doing it, > >> but then after further consideration I wasn't so sure. > >> > >> if key[:1] + key[-1:] == '<>': ... > > > > if key[:1] == '<' and key[-1:] == '>: ... > > is the obvious choice to me. If the first clause is false, it never > > computes the second. > > > And therefore no need for the second colon. > > if key[:1] == '<' and key[-1] == '>: ... I'd leave the second colon in. It makes the statement more uniform, and therefor easier to understand.
- Previous message (by thread): A curious bit of code...
- Next message (by thread): A curious bit of code...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list