efficient way to process data
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 11:37:42 EST 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jan 14 11:37:42 EST 2014
- Previous message (by thread): efficient way to process data
- Next message (by thread): efficient way to process data
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> As far as I'm concerned, you won geek cred the moment you said >> "electron microscope", and "semiconductor wafers as they are being >> manufactured" is just gravy. > > Thanks! You made my day. I showed this to my wife and she asked "Is that good?" Heh! Geek language can be a bit weird at times. Of course, it's not a dream job if things like this get tantalizingly dangled in front of you and then taken away as you're given something less fun and more urgent to do... >> Do you actually mean here that the two points need to be within 1 >> micron, or that data gets combined if it's nearby in *either* >> coordinate? > > Either coordinate. Okay, so the code I put together earlier in the thread is correct. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): efficient way to process data
- Next message (by thread): efficient way to process data
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list